Is Mean Curvature Flow a Gradient Flow?
Zhonggan Huang

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether the mean curvature flow can be represented as a gradient flow in nondegenerate metric spaces of plane curves, concluding that it cannot in the studied cases.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the mean curvature flow does not admit a gradient flow structure in two specific nondegenerate metric spaces of plane curves.
Findings
Mean curvature flow is not a gradient flow in the uniformness-preserving metric space.
Mean curvature flow is not a gradient flow in the curvature-weighted metric space.
The study clarifies limitations of gradient flow representations for mean curvature flow.
Abstract
It is well-known that the mean curvature flow is a formal gradient flow of the perimeter functional. However, by the work of Michor and Mumford [7,8], the formal Riemannian structure that is compatible with the gradient flow structure induces a degenerate metric on the space of hypersurfaces. It is then natural to ask whether there is a nondegenerate metric space of hypersurfaces, on which the mean curvature flow admits a gradient flow structure. In this paper we study the mean curvature flow on two nondegenerate metric spaces of simple closed plane curves: the uniformness-preserving metric structure proposed by Shi and Vorotnikov [11] and the curvature-weighted structure proposed by Michor and Mumford [8], and prove that the mean curvature flow is not a gradient flow in either of the spaces.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Geometry and complex manifolds · Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
