Is the study of Indigenous mathematics ill-directed or beneficial?
Hongzhang Xu, Rowena Ball

TL;DR
This paper reviews the legitimacy and pedagogical value of Indigenous mathematics, countering misconceptions and highlighting its historical practice and recent curriculum inclusion to promote understanding and acceptance.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of misconceptions about Indigenous mathematics and advocates for its recognition and integration in education curricula.
Findings
Indigenous communities historically practiced mathematics.
Recent curriculum initiatives include Indigenous mathematical content.
Counterarguments address misconceptions about Indigenous mathematical abilities.
Abstract
The old lie of mathematical inadequacy of Indigenous communities has been curiously persistent despite increasing evidence shows that many Indigenous communities practiced mathematics. Attempts to study and teach Indigenous mathematical knowledge have always been questioned and even denied validity. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Histories and Cultures cross-curriculum priority in the F-10 Australian schools curriculum, from 2022 onwards, includes content elaborations related to Indigenous mathematics, which have been developed and refined by expert Indigenous advisers. We celebrate this initiative, but experience also tells us to expect some resistance from sectors of the education communities who hold to an exclusively Anglo-European provenance of mathematics. Through this review article we seek to constructively forestall potential pushback and address concerns regarding…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques · Science Education and Pedagogy
