Observational and Interventional Causal Learning for Regret-Minimizing Control

TL;DR

This paper combines observational and interventional causal discovery methods to improve regret-minimizing control, demonstrating enhanced predictive accuracy and reduced regret through extended algorithms and active learning strategies.

Contribution

It introduces an extended LPCMCI algorithm that incorporates interventional constraints, improving causal model accuracy and control performance.

Findings

Extended LPCMCI achieves 84.6% optimal prediction accuracy with perfect interventional constraints.

Using interventional constraints improves SCM reconstruction from 53.6% to 60.9%.

Average regret decreases from 1.2 to 1.0 with the extended causal discovery approach.

Abstract

We explore how observational and interventional causal discovery methods can be combined. A state-of-the-art observational causal discovery algorithm for time series capable of handling latent confounders and contemporaneous effects, called LPCMCI, is extended to profit from casual constraints found through randomized control trials. Numerical results show that, given perfect interventional constraints, the reconstructed structural causal models (SCMs) of the extended LPCMCI allow 84.6% of the time for the optimal prediction of the target variable. The implementation of interventional and observational causal discovery is modular, allowing causal constraints from other sources. The second part of this thesis investigates the question of regret minimizing control by simultaneously learning a causal model and planning actions through the causal model. The idea is that an agent to optimize a measured variable first learns the system's mechanics through observational causal discovery. The agent then intervenes on the most promising variable with randomized values allowing for the exploitation and generation of new interventional data. The agent then uses the interventional data to enhance the causal model further, allowing improved actions the next time. The extended LPCMCI can be favorable compared to the original LPCMCI algorithm. The numerical results show that detecting and using interventional constraints leads to reconstructed SCMs that allow 60.9% of the time for the optimal prediction of the target variable in contrast to the baseline of 53.6% when using the original LPCMCI algorithm. Furthermore, the induced average regret decreases from 1.2 when using the original LPCMCI algorithm to 1.0 when using the extended LPCMCI algorithm with interventional discovery.