Pseudo Redshifts of Gamma-Ray Bursts Derived from the L-T-E Correlation
Chen Deng, Yong-Feng Huang, and Fan Xu

TL;DR
This study confirms and refines the L-T-E correlation in gamma-ray burst afterglows, enabling the estimation of pseudo redshifts for GRBs lacking direct measurements, thus expanding our understanding of their properties.
Contribution
The paper updates and validates the L-T-E correlation using a larger sample, allowing for the derivation of pseudo redshifts for additional GRBs.
Findings
The L-T-E correlation is confirmed as $L_{X} \\propto T_{a}^{-0.99} E_{\\gamma ,\\rm iso}^{0.86}$.
Pseudo redshifts were successfully derived for 130 GRBs without known redshifts.
Statistical analysis of the pseudo redshift sample provides new insights into GRB properties.
Abstract
The X-ray afterglow of many gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) exhibits a plateau phase before the normal power-law decay stage, which may be related to continued activities of the central engine. Tang et al. 2019 collected 174 such GRBs and confirmed the so called correlation which involves three key parameters, i.e., the isotropic -ray energy of the prompt phase, the end time of the plateau phase and the corresponding X-ray luminosity . In this study, the correlation is confirmed and updated as with a large sample consisting of 210 plateau GRBs with known redshifts. The tight correlation is then applied to derive the pseudo redshift of other 130 plateau GRBs whose redshifts are not directly measured. Statistical analysis is also carried out on this pseudo redshift sample.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
