TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that deep kernel learning (DKL) provides better calibrated and more reliable mortality predictions than standard neural networks when facing temporal shifts in healthcare data, highlighting the importance of uncertainty modeling.
Contribution
It shows that DKL outperforms recurrent neural networks in calibration and discrimination under temporal shifts, emphasizing the value of uncertainty-aware models in healthcare prediction tasks.
Findings
DKL yields superior calibration on prospective data.
DKL's predictions are less overconfident and more reliable.
DKL achieves higher AUC than baseline neural models.
Abstract
Neural models, with their ability to provide novel representations, have shown promising results in prediction tasks in healthcare. However, patient demographics, medical technology, and quality of care change over time. This often leads to drop in the performance of neural models for prospective patients, especially in terms of their calibration. The deep kernel learning (DKL) framework may be robust to such changes as it combines neural models with Gaussian processes, which are aware of prediction uncertainty. Our hypothesis is that out-of-distribution test points will result in probabilities closer to the global mean and hence prevent overconfident predictions. This in turn, we hypothesise, will result in better calibration on prospective data. This paper investigates DKL's behaviour when facing a temporal shift, which was naturally introduced when an information system that feeds…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsDeep Kernel Learning · Test · Attentive Walk-Aggregating Graph Neural Network
