Rethinking Two Consensuses of the Transferability in Deep Learning
Yixiong Chen, Jingxian Li, Chris Ding, Li Liu

TL;DR
This paper investigates the transferability of pre-trained deep neural networks across diverse datasets, confirming previous beliefs and revealing new factors like data amount and diversity affecting transferability.
Contribution
It introduces a method to measure transferability and broadens understanding beyond natural images, highlighting new factors influencing transferability.
Findings
Larger domain gap reduces transferability.
More data and diversity can hinder transferability.
Lower layers are not always the most transferable.
Abstract
Deep transfer learning (DTL) has formed a long-term quest toward enabling deep neural networks (DNNs) to reuse historical experiences as efficiently as humans. This ability is named knowledge transferability. A commonly used paradigm for DTL is firstly learning general knowledge (pre-training) and then reusing (fine-tuning) them for a specific target task. There are two consensuses of transferability of pre-trained DNNs: (1) a larger domain gap between pre-training and downstream data brings lower transferability; (2) the transferability gradually decreases from lower layers (near input) to higher layers (near output). However, these consensuses were basically drawn from the experiments based on natural images, which limits their scope of application. This work aims to study and complement them from a broader perspective by proposing a method to measure the transferability of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Advanced Neural Network Applications · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
