Background Determination for the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Dark Matter Experiment
J. Aalbers, D.S. Akerib, A.K. Al Musalhi, F. Alder, S.K. Alsum, C.S., Amarasinghe, A. Ames, T.J. Anderson, N. Angelides, H.M. Ara\'ujo, J.E., Armstrong, M. Arthurs, A. Baker, J. Bang, J.W. Bargemann, A. Baxter, K., Beattie, P. Beltrame, E.P. Bernard, A. Bhatti, A. Biekert, T.P.

TL;DR
This paper provides a detailed background analysis for the LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter experiment, confirming background levels and supporting future physics analyses including WIMP searches and neutrinoless double-beta decay.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive background determination methodology and validates in-situ background estimates against ex-situ assays for LZ data.
Findings
Background rate after WIMP search criteria was (6.3±0.5)×10^{-5} events/keV_{ee}/kg/day.
Background levels are consistent with expectations from assays.
Background rate is approximately 60 times lower than previous LUX results.
Abstract
The LUX-ZEPLIN experiment recently reported limits on WIMP-nucleus interactions from its initial science run, down to cm for the spin-independent interaction of a 36 GeV/c WIMP at 90% confidence level. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of the backgrounds important for this result and for other upcoming physics analyses, including neutrinoless double-beta decay searches and effective field theory interpretations of LUX-ZEPLIN data. We confirm that the in-situ determinations of bulk and fixed radioactive backgrounds are consistent with expectations from the ex-situ assays. The observed background rate after WIMP search criteria were applied was events/keV/kg/day in the low-energy region, approximately 60 times lower than the equivalent rate reported by the LUX experiment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
