Bayesian modeling of the political preferences of the Colombian Senate 2006-2010: electoral behavior and parapolitics
Juan Valero, Juan Sosa, Carolina Luque

TL;DR
This paper applies Bayesian spatial voting models to Colombian Senate votes from 2006-2010, revealing a latent opposition dimension and linking parapolitics scandals to legislative behavior.
Contribution
First application of Bayesian spatial voting models to Colombian legislative data, uncovering a non-ideological opposition dimension and its association with parapolitics scandals.
Findings
Identified a latent opposition dimension in Senate voting behavior.
Established a significant link between parapolitics involvement and voting patterns.
Demonstrated the effectiveness of Bayesian models in political analysis.
Abstract
In this paper, a Bayesian spatial voting model is applied for the first time to characterize the legislative behavior of the Senate of the Republic of Colombia for the period 2006-2010. The analysis is carried out based on the plenary nominal votes of the Senate. The estimation of the model is done using Markov Monte Carlo chain algorithms. The estimated ideal points provide empirical evidence supporting a latent non-ideological feature (opposition--non-opposition) underlying senators' voting. Additionally, the relationship between the parapolitics scandal and the legislative behavior of senators is analyzed through a logistic model, both Bayesian and frequentist. The results indicate a significant relationship between being or having been involved with the parapolitics scandal and the legislative behavior of the senators from the period 2006-2010.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPublic Policy and Governance · Spatial and Panel Data Analysis · Income, Poverty, and Inequality
