Non-uniform complexity via non-wellfounded proofs
Gianluca Curzi, Anupam Das

TL;DR
This paper explores how non-wellfounded cyclic proofs can model non-uniform complexity classes like FP/poly, extending previous work on cyclic proofs and complexity characterization.
Contribution
It provides a novel proof-theoretic characterization of FP/poly using non-wellfounded cyclic proofs, linking proof irregularity to non-uniformity in complexity theory.
Findings
Characterizes FP/poly via non-wellfounded cyclic proofs.
Introduces proof-level conditions for non-uniformity.
Formalizes folklore techniques for non-uniform class characterization.
Abstract
Cyclic and non-wellfounded proofs are now increasingly employed to establish metalogical results in a variety of settings, in particular for type systems with forms of (co)induction. Under the Curry-Howard correspondence, a cyclic proof can be seen as a typing derivation 'with loops', closer to low-level machine models, and so comprise a highly expressive computational model that nonetheless enjoys excellent metalogical properties. In recent work, we showed how the cyclic proof setting can be further employed to model computational complexity, yielding characterisations of the polynomial time and elementary computable functions. These characterisations are 'implicit', inspired by Bellantoni and Cook's famous algebra of safe recursion, but exhibit greater expressivity thanks to the looping capacity of cyclic proofs. In this work we investigate the capacity for non-wellfounded proofs,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
