How Important are Good Method Names in Neural Code Generation? A Model Robustness Perspective

TL;DR

This paper investigates the significance of method names in neural code generation models, proposing a robustness framework with attack and defense mechanisms that demonstrate the impact of method name quality on code generation performance.

Contribution

It introduces RADAR, a novel approach with attack and defense components, to evaluate and enhance the robustness of pre-trained code generation models against method name perturbations.

Findings

Adversarial method names significantly reduce code quality metrics.

Synthesized method names can restore model performance.

Method name quality critically affects neural code generation robustness.

Abstract

Pre-trained code generation models (PCGMs) have been widely applied in neural code generation which can generate executable code from functional descriptions in natural languages, possibly together with signatures. Despite substantial performance improvement of PCGMs, the role of method names in neural code generation has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we study and demonstrate the potential of benefiting from method names to enhance the performance of PCGMs, from a model robustness perspective. Specifically, we propose a novel approach, named RADAR (neuRAl coDe generAtor Robustifier). RADAR consists of two components: RADAR-Attack and RADAR-Defense. The former attacks a PCGM by generating adversarial method names as part of the input, which are semantic and visual similar to the original input, but may trick the PCGM to generate completely unrelated code snippets. As a countermeasure to such attacks, RADAR-Defense synthesizes a new method name from the functional description and supplies it to the PCGM. Evaluation results show that RADAR-Attack can reduce the CodeBLEU of generated code by 19.72% to 38.74% in three state-of-the-art PCGMs (i.e., CodeGPT, PLBART, and CodeT5) in the fine-tuning code generation task, and reduce the Pass@1 of generated code by 32.28% to 44.42% in three state-of-the-art PCGMs (i.e., Replit, CodeGen, and CodeT5+) in the zero-shot code generation task. Moreover, RADAR-Defense is able to reinstate the performance of PCGMs with synthesized method names. These results highlight the importance of good method names in neural code generation and implicate the benefits of studying model robustness in software engineering.