Symmetric Formulas for Products of Permutations

TL;DR

This paper establishes tight lower bounds on the formula complexity of the permutation word problem, highlighting the impact of symmetry invariance on computational complexity for permutation groups.

Contribution

It proves nearly matching lower bounds for invariant formulas computing the permutation word problem, extending to general finite simple groups and abelian groups.

Findings

Proves an $n^{ heta( ext{log }k)}$ lower bound for $S_n^{k-1}$-invariant formulas.

Extends bounds to $G^{k-1}$-invariant formulas for finite simple groups.

Provides bounds for abelian groups in invariant formula complexity.

Abstract

We study the formula complexity of the word problem $\mathsf{Word}_{S_n,k} : \{0,1\}^{kn^2} \to \{0,1\}$: given $n$-by-$n$ permutation matrices $M_1,\dots,M_k$, compute the $(1,1)$-entry of the matrix product $M_1\cdots M_k$. An important feature of this function is that it is invariant under action of $S_n^{k-1}$ given by \[ (\pi_1,\dots,\pi_{k-1})(M_1,\dots,M_k) = (M_1\pi_1^{-1},\pi_1M_2\pi_2^{-1},\dots,\pi_{k-2}M_{k-1}\pi_{k-1}^{-1},\pi_{k-1}M_k). \] This symmetry is also exhibited in the smallest known unbounded fan-in $\{\mathsf{AND},\mathsf{OR},\mathsf{NOT}\}$-formulas for $\mathsf{Word}_{S_n,k}$, which have size $n^{O(\log k)}$. In this paper we prove a matching $n^{\Omega(\log k)}$ lower bound for $S_n^{k-1}$-invariant formulas computing $\mathsf{Word}_{S_n,k}$. This result is motivated by the fact that a similar lower bound for unrestricted (non-invariant) formulas would separate complexity classes $\mathsf{NC}^1$ and $\mathsf{Logspace}$. Our more general main theorem gives a nearly tight $n^{d(k^{1/d}-1)}$ lower bound on the $G^{k-1}$-invariant depth-$d$ $\{\mathsf{MAJ},\mathsf{AND},\mathsf{OR},\mathsf{NOT}\}$-formula size of $\mathsf{Word}_{G,k}$ for any finite simple group $G$ whose minimum permutation representation has degree~$n$. We also give nearly tight lower bounds on the $G^{k-1}$-invariant depth-$d$ $\{\mathsf{AND},\mathsf{OR},\mathsf{NOT}\}$-formula size in the case where $G$ is an abelian group.