Semantic Table Detection with LayoutLMv3
Ivan Silajev, Niels Victor, Phillip Mortimer

TL;DR
This study applies LayoutLMv3 to semantic table detection in financial documents but finds no significant improvement, highlighting challenges in leveraging semantic info for table detection.
Contribution
The paper evaluates LayoutLMv3 for semantic table detection and discusses potential reasons for its limited effectiveness in this task.
Findings
No improvement in table detection accuracy with semantic info
Possible issues with model weights or hyperparameter tuning
Semantic information may not enhance table detection performance
Abstract
This paper presents an application of the LayoutLMv3 model for semantic table detection on financial documents from the IIIT-AR-13K dataset. The motivation behind this paper's experiment was that LayoutLMv3's official paper had no results for table detection using semantic information. We concluded that our approach did not improve the model's table detection capabilities, for which we can give several possible reasons. Either the model's weights were unsuitable for our purpose, or we needed to invest more time in optimising the model's hyperparameters. It is also possible that semantic information does not improve a model's table detection accuracy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing · Stock Market Forecasting Methods · Data Quality and Management
