Distributionally Robust Optimal Allocation with Costly Verification
Halil \.Ibrahim Bayrak, \c{C}a\u{g}{\i}l Ko\c{c}yi\u{g}it, Daniel, Kuhn, Mustafa \c{C}elebi P{\i}nar

TL;DR
This paper develops a robust mechanism design framework for allocating a single good to agents with private types, considering costly verification and ambiguity in joint type distributions, resulting in explicit Pareto-robustly optimal mechanisms.
Contribution
It introduces explicit favored-agent mechanisms that are robust against distributional ambiguity in agents' types, extending prior models that assumed known independent distributions.
Findings
Constructed explicit Pareto-robustly optimal mechanisms.
Analyzed support-only and Markov ambiguity sets.
Mechanisms perform well under worst-case distributional assumptions.
Abstract
We consider the mechanism design problem of a principal allocating a single good to one of several agents without monetary transfers. Each agent desires the good and uses it to create value for the principal. We designate this value as the agent's private type. Even though the principal does not know the agents' types, she can verify them at a cost. The allocation of the good thus depends on the agents' self-declared types and the results of any verification performed, and the principal's payoff matches her value of the allocation minus the costs of verification. It is known that if the agents' types are independent, then a favored-agent mechanism maximizes her expected payoff. However, this result relies on the unrealistic assumptions that the agents' types follow known independent probability distributions. In contrast, we assume here that the agents' types are governed by an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Economic theories and models
