Classical freeness of orthosymplectic affine vertex superalgebras
Thomas Creutzig, Andrew R. Linshaw, and Bailin Song

TL;DR
This paper proves the classical freeness property for a broad class of orthosymplectic affine vertex superalgebras, extending previous results to all positive integer parameters satisfying a specific inequality.
Contribution
It establishes the classical freeness of simple affine vertex superalgebras $L_n(\mathfrak{osp}_{m|2r})$ for all positive integers meeting a certain inequality, generalizing prior work.
Findings
Proves classical freeness for $L_n(\mathfrak{osp}_{m|2r})$ with specified parameters.
Includes all rational vertex superalgebras $L_n(\mathfrak{osp}_{1|2r})$.
Extends previous results to a wider class of affine vertex superalgebras.
Abstract
The question of when a vertex algebra is a quantization of the arc space of its associated scheme has recently received a lot of attention in both the mathematics and physics literature. This property was first studied by Tomoyuki Arakawa and Anne Moreau [Lectures on -algebras, Australian Representation Theory Workshop 2016, University of Melbourne], and was given the name "classical freeness" by Jethro van Ekeren and Reimundo Heluani in their work on chiral homology [Comm. Math. Phys. 386 (2021), no. 1, 495-550]. Later, it was extended to vertex superalgebras by Hao Li [Eur. J. Math. 7 (2021), 1689-1728]. In this note, we prove the classical freeness of the simple affine vertex superalgebra for all positive integers satisfying . In particular, it holds for the rational vertex superalgebras…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
