Testing definitional equivalence of theories via automorphism groups
H. Andr\'eka, J. Madar\'asz, I. N\'emeti, G. Sz\'ekely

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when two first-order theories are definitionally equivalent by examining automorphism groups and model category isomorphisms, settling several longstanding conjectures in the field.
Contribution
It establishes a new criterion for definitional equivalence using automorphism groups and model categories, extending prior theorems and resolving open conjectures.
Findings
Definitionally equivalent theories correspond to isomorphic automorphism groups.
Uncountably many inequivalent theories can have isomorphic model categories.
The results settle several conjectures by Barrett, Glymour, and Halvorson.
Abstract
Two first-order logic theories are definitionally equivalent if and only if there is a bijection between their model classes that preserves isomorphisms and ultraproducts (Theorem 2). This is a variant of a prior theorem of van Benthem and Pearce. In Example 2, uncountably many pairs of definitionally inequivalent theories are given such that their model categories are concretely isomorphic via bijections that preserve ultraproducts in the model categories up to isomorphism. Based on these results, we settle several conjectures of Barrett, Glymour and Halvorson.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Logic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
