Time's Arrow and Simultaneity: A Critique of Rovelli's Views
Julian Barbour

TL;DR
This paper critiques Rovelli's views on the nature of time, arguing that entropy growth is not the origin of the arrow of time and proposing the possibility of universal simultaneity within general relativity.
Contribution
It challenges traditional thermodynamic explanations of time's arrow and offers a revised perspective on simultaneity in general relativity.
Findings
Entropy growth is not the sole origin of time's arrow
Universal simultaneity may exist in general relativity
Reevaluation of foundational concepts in the physics of time
Abstract
In the joint paper "Bridging the neuroscience and physics of time" Rovelli, as the physicist coauthor of neuroscientist Dean Buonomano, makes statements that rely on theoretical frameworks employed when the laws of thermodynamics and general relativity were discovered. Their reconsideration in the light of subsequent insights suggests growth of entropy is not the origin of time's arrow and that a notion of universal simultaneity may exist within general relativity. This paper is a slightly extended form of my invited contribution to the forthcoming Frontiers in Psychology special issue "Physical time within human time".
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
