Population statistics of intermediate mass black holes in dwarf galaxies using the NewHorizon simulation
R. S. Beckmann, Y. Dubois, M. Volonteri, C. A. Dong-P\'aez, M., Trebitsch, J. Devriendt, S. Kaviraj, T. Kimm, S. Peirani

TL;DR
This study uses the NewHorizon simulation to analyze the evolution, occupation, and growth limitations of intermediate mass black holes in dwarf galaxies, revealing their limited growth and dynamic displacement from galaxy centers.
Contribution
It provides new insights into IMBH occupation fractions, growth patterns, and dynamical behaviors in dwarf galaxies using large-scale cosmological simulation data.
Findings
IMBH occupation fraction is at least 50% in dwarf galaxies with stellar mass down to 10^6 Msun.
IMBH growth is limited and more efficient at high redshift (z=3).
IMBHs often become dynamically displaced from galaxy centers, especially at lower redshifts.
Abstract
While it is well established that supermassive black holes (SMBHs) co-evolve with their host galaxy, it is currently less clear how lower mass black holes, so-called intermediate mass black holes (IMBHs), evolve within their dwarf galaxy hosts. In this paper, we present results on the evolution of a large sample of IMBHs from the NewHorizon simulation. We show that occupation fractions of IMBHs in dwarf galaxies are at least 50 percent for galaxies with stellar masses down to 1E6 Msun, but BH growth is very limited in dwarf galaxies. In NewHorizon, IMBH growth is somewhat more efficient at high redshift z = 3 but in general IMBH do not grow significantly until their host galaxy leaves the dwarf regime. As a result, NewHorizon under-predicts observed AGN luminosity function and AGN fractions. We show that the difficulties of IMBH to remain attached to the centres of their host galaxies…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
