The most massive stars in very young star clusters with a limited mass: Evidence favours significant self-regulation in the star formation processes

TL;DR

This study provides evidence that star formation is a self-regulated process, challenging the idea of a purely stochastic initial mass function, by analyzing the relation between the most massive star and its cluster mass.

Contribution

It introduces a deterministic sampling method for stellar masses that better matches observations, challenging the traditional stochastic IMF model.

Findings

Observed $m_{max}$--$M_{ecl}$ distribution is tighter than stochastic models predict.

Rejects the stochastic IMF hypothesis at over 4.5 sigma confidence.

Finds a flattening in the $m_{max}$--$M_{ecl}$ relation near 13 solar masses, indicating feedback effects.

Abstract

The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is commonly interpreted to be a scale-invariant probability density distribution function (PDF) such that many small clusters yield the same IMF as one massive cluster of the same combined number of stars. Observations of the galaxy-wide IMF challenge this as dwarf galaxies do not form as many massive stars as expected. This indicates a highly self-regulated star formation process in which stellar masses are not stochastically sampled from the IMF and are instead related to the environment of star formation. Here, the nature of star formation is studied using the relation between the most massive star born in a star cluster and its parental stellar cluster mass (the $m_{\rm max}$--$M_{\rm ecl}$ relation). This relation has been argued to be a statistical effect if stars are sampled randomly from the IMF. By comparing the tightness of the observed $m_{\rm max}$--$M_{\rm ecl}$ distribution with synthetic star clusters with stochastically sampled stellar masses, we find that the expected dispersion of the mock observations is much larger than the observed dispersion. Assuming that $m_{\rm max}$ and $M_{\rm ecl}$ uncertainties from the literature are correct, our test rejects the hypothesis that the IMF is a PDF at a more than $4.5\sigma$ confidence level. Alternatively, we provide a deterministic stellar mass sampling tool which reproduces the observed $m_{\rm max}$--$M_{\rm ecl}$ distribution and compares well with the luminosities of star-forming molecular clumps. In addition, we find that there is a significant flattening of the $m_{\rm max}$--$M_{\rm ecl}$ relation near $m_{\rm max}=13~M_\odot$. This may suggest strong feedback of stars more massive than about $13~M_\odot$ and/or the ejections of the most massive stars from young clusters in the mass range 63 to $400~M_\odot$ to be likely important physical processes in forming clusters.