Complexity Framework For Forbidden Subgraphs I: The Framework
Matthew Johnson, Barnaby Martin, Jelle J. Oostveen, Sukanya, Pandey, Dani\"el Paulusma, Siani Smith, Erik Jan van Leeuwen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a general framework to classify the computational complexity of graph problems on $HH$-subgraph-free graphs, unifying many known results and resolving open questions through a set of structural conditions.
Contribution
It proposes a meta-classification framework based on structural properties that determines when problems are polynomial-time solvable or NP-hard on $HH$-subgraph-free graphs.
Findings
Dichotomy between polynomial-time solvability and NP-completeness for many problems.
Almost-linear-time solvability versus no subquadratic-time algorithms under hardness hypotheses.
Framework applies broadly, unifying and extending previous results.
Abstract
For any particular class of graphs, algorithms for computational problems restricted to the class often rely on structural properties that depend on the specific problem at hand. This begs the question if a large set of such results can be explained by some common problem conditions. We propose such conditions for -subgraph-free graphs. For a set of graphs , a graph is -subgraph-free if does not contain any of graph from as a subgraph. Our conditions are easy to state. A graph problem must be efficiently solvable on graphs of bounded treewidth, computationally hard on subcubic graphs, and computational hardness must be preserved under edge subdivision of subcubic graphs. Our meta-classification says that if a graph problem satisfies all three conditions, then for every finite set , it is ``efficiently solvable'' on -subgraph-free graphs if contains a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
