Following all the rules: Intuitionistic completeness for generalised proof-theoretic validity
Will Stafford, Victor Nascimento

TL;DR
This paper introduces a refined notion called generalized proof-theoretic validity, demonstrating that its associated logic is precisely intuitionistic logic, correcting previous misconceptions about proof-theoretic validity.
Contribution
It proposes a minor modification to the definition of proof-theoretic validity and proves that the resulting logic aligns exactly with intuitionistic logic.
Findings
Generalized proof-theoretic validity is closed under substitution.
The logic of generalized proof-theoretic validity is intuitionistic.
Refinement resolves previous disprovals of Prawitz's conjecture.
Abstract
Prawitz conjectured that the proof-theoretically valid logic is intuitionistic logic. Recent work on proof-theoretic validity has disproven this. In fact, it has been shown that proof-theoretic validity is not even closed under substitution. In this paper, we make a minor modification to the definition of proof-theoretic validity found in Prawitz (1973) and refined by Schroeder-Heister (2006). We will call the new notion generalised proof-theoretic validity and show that the logic of generalised proof-theoretic validity is intuitionistic logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Logic, programming, and type systems
