TL;DR
This paper investigates the relative strengths of various restricted proof systems in propositional logic, establishing exponential separations and demonstrating polynomial proofs for certain principles, thereby clarifying their comparative power.
Contribution
It provides the first exponential separations among several proof systems without new variables and constructs polynomial-size proofs for the pigeonhole principle in SBC${}^-$.
Findings
Separated RAT${}^-$ from GER${}^-$ and vice versa
Separated SBC${}^-$ from RAT${}^-$
Polynomial-size SBC${}^-$ proofs of the pigeonhole principle
Abstract
We study the complexity of proof systems augmenting resolution with inference rules that allow, given a formula in conjunctive normal form, deriving clauses that are not necessarily logically implied by but whose addition to preserves satisfiability. When the derived clauses are allowed to introduce variables not occurring in , the systems we consider become equivalent to extended resolution. We are concerned with the versions of these systems without new variables. They are called BC, RAT, SBC, and GER, denoting respectively blocked clauses, resolution asymmetric tautologies, set-blocked clauses, and generalized extended resolution. Each of these systems formalizes some restricted version of the ability to make assumptions that hold "without loss of generality," which is commonly used informally to simplify or shorten proofs.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Exponential separations using guarded extension variables· youtube
