Photons are lying about where they have been, again
Gregory Reznik, Carlotta Versmold, Jan Dziewior, Florian Huber,, Shrobona Bagchi, Harald Weinfurter, Justin Dressel, Lev Vaidman

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the interpretation of photon presence in quantum experiments, resolving apparent contradictions through interference effects and validating findings with computer simulations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of photon presence characterization in pre- and postselected states, clarifying previous conflicting claims.
Findings
Interference effects explain apparent photon presence contradictions.
Computer simulations support the theoretical analysis.
Weak value approach's limitations are addressed.
Abstract
Bhati and Arvind [Phys. Lett. A, 127955 (2022)] recently argued that in a specially designed experiment the timing of photon detection events demonstrates photon presence at a location at which they are not present according to the weak value approach. The alleged contradiction is resolved by a subtle interference effect resulting in anomalous sensitivity of the signal imprinted on the postselected photons for the interaction at this location, similarly to the case of a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer with a Dove prism [Quant. Stud.: Mat. Found. 2, 255 (2015)]. We perform an in depth analysis of the characterization of the presence of a pre- and postselected particle at a particular location based on information imprinted on the particle itself. The theoretical results are tested by a computer simulation of the proposed experiment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiofield Effects and Biophysics · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
