On the profinite rigidity of free and surface groups
Ismael Morales

TL;DR
This paper proves that certain groups with the same pro-p completion as free or surface groups are structurally similar, establishing new results in profinite rigidity and subgroup properties.
Contribution
It introduces a new approach to profinite rigidity, confirming Remeslennikov's conjecture for specific classes and analyzing subgroup topologies in residually nilpotent groups.
Findings
Two-generated subgroups of G are free.
Confirmed profinite rigidity for groups in class H_{ab}.
Proved S×Z^n is profinitely rigid among residually free groups.
Abstract
Let be either a free group or the fundamental group of a closed hyperbolic surface. We show that if is a finitely generated residually- group with the same pro- completion as , then two-generated subgroups of are free. This generalises (and gives a new proof of) the analogous result of Baumslag for parafree groups. Our argument relies on the following new ingredient: if is a residually-(torsion-free nilpotent) group and is a virtually polycyclic subgroup, then is nilpotent and the pro- topology of induces on its full pro- topology. Then we study applications to profinite rigidity. Remeslennikov conjectured that a finitely generated residually finite with profinite completion is necessarily . We confirm this when belongs to a class of groups that has a finite abelian…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
