A comment on Metric vs Metric-Affine Gravity
Ulf Lindstr\"om, \"Ozg\"ur Sar{\i}o\u{g}lu

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that adding a Pontryagin density to the Einstein-Hilbert action in any even dimension results in a theory where the affine connection becomes Levi-Civita, making the metric and affine theories equivalent, contrary to previous theorems.
Contribution
It provides a counterexample showing that metric and metric-affine models can be equivalent beyond Lovelock theories by including Pontryagin densities in arbitrary even dimensions.
Findings
Pontryagin density is a covariant divergence of Chern-Simons current in any even dimension.
The connection field equations enforce Levi-Civita connection, linking metric and affine formulations.
The result challenges the belief that only Lovelock theories have metric-affine equivalence.
Abstract
We consider the sum of the Einstein-Hilbert action and a Pontryagin density (PD) in arbitrary even dimension . All curvatures are functions of independent affine (torsionless) connections only. In arbitrary dimension, not only in , these first order PD terms are shown to be covariant divergences of "Chern-Simons" currents. The field equation for the connection leads to it being Levi-Civita, and to the metric and affine field equations being equivalent to the second order metric theory. This result is a counterexample to the theorem stating that purely metric and metric-affine models can only be equivalent for Lovelock theories.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
