Predicting adverse outcomes following catheter ablation treatment for atrial fibrillation

TL;DR

This study develops and evaluates survival models to predict adverse outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, finding high accuracy for composite events but limited prediction for major bleeding.

Contribution

Introduces prognostic models using linked health data to predict post-ablation adverse outcomes, highlighting the potential for clinical risk management.

Findings

Models accurately predict composite adverse outcomes with concordance > 0.79.

Models poorly predict major bleeding events with concordance < 0.66.

Key predictors include comorbidities, age, and specific therapies.

Abstract

Objective: To develop prognostic survival models for predicting adverse outcomes after catheter ablation treatment for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We used a linked dataset including hospital administrative data, prescription medicine claims, emergency department presentations, and death registrations of patients in New South Wales, Australia. The cohort included patients who received catheter ablation for AF. Traditional and deep survival models were trained to predict major bleeding events and a composite of heart failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, and death. Results: Out of a total of 3285 patients in the cohort, 177 (5.3%) experienced the composite outcome (heart failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, death) and 167 (5.1%) experienced major bleeding events after catheter ablation treatment. Models predicting the composite outcome had high risk discrimination accuracy, with the best model having a concordance index > 0.79 at the evaluated time horizons. Models for predicting major bleeding events had poor risk discrimination performance, with all models having a concordance index < 0.66. The most impactful features for the models predicting higher risk were comorbidities indicative of poor health, older age, and therapies commonly used in sicker patients to treat heart failure and AF. Conclusions: Diagnosis and medication history did not contain sufficient information for precise risk prediction of experiencing major bleeding events. The models for predicting the composite outcome have the potential to enable clinicians to identify and manage high-risk patients following catheter ablation proactively. Future research is needed to validate the usefulness of these models in clinical practice.