Descent modulus and applications
Aris Daniilidis, Laurent Miclo (IMT), David Salas

TL;DR
This paper introduces an axiomatic framework for descent moduli applicable to various functions on general spaces, revealing that such moduli can often determine the functions themselves, with specific insights for finite spaces.
Contribution
It proposes a unified axiomatic definition of descent modulus encompassing smooth, nonsmooth, and probabilistic functions, and demonstrates their determining power.
Findings
Descent modulus can fully determine functions in many cases.
A classification of descent operators on finite spaces is provided.
The framework unifies various notions of descent in a general setting.
Abstract
The norm of the gradient f (x) measures the maximum descent of a real-valued smooth function f at x. For (nonsmooth) convex functions, this is expressed by the distance dist(0, f (x)) of the subdifferential to the origin, while for general real-valued functions defined on metric spaces by the notion of metric slope |f |(x). In this work we propose an axiomatic definition of descent modulus T [f ](x) of a real-valued function f at every point x, defined on a general (not necessarily metric) space. The definition encompasses all above instances as well as average descents for functions defined on probability spaces. We show that a large class of functions are completely determined by their descent modulus and corresponding critical values. This result is already surprising in the smooth case: a one-dimensional information (norm of the gradient) turns out to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
