Treedepth vs circumference
Marcin Bria\'nski, Gwena\"el Joret, Konrad Majewski, Piotr, Micek, Micha{\l} T. Seweryn, Roohani Sharma

TL;DR
This paper establishes a tight upper bound on the treedepth of 2-connected graphs based on their circumference, improving previous quadratic bounds and deepening understanding of graph parameters.
Contribution
It proves that for 2-connected graphs, treedepth is at most the circumference, strengthening prior results and providing the best possible bound.
Findings
Treedepth of 2-connected graphs is at most their circumference.
The bound is tight and cannot be improved.
Improves previous quadratic bounds by Marshall and Wood.
Abstract
The circumference of a graph is the length of a longest cycle in , or if has no cycle. Birmel\'e (2003) showed that the treewidth of a graph is at most its circumference minus . We strengthen this result for -connected graphs as follows: If is -connected, then its treedepth is at most its circumference. The bound is best possible and improves on an earlier quadratic upper bound due to Marshall and Wood (2015).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Interconnection Networks and Systems
