Data-Driven Offline Decision-Making via Invariant Representation Learning

TL;DR

This paper introduces invariant representation learning for offline decision-making, framing the problem as domain adaptation to improve prediction accuracy under distributional shift without active data collection.

Contribution

It proposes invariant objective models (IOM) that enforce invariance in learned representations to address distributional shift in offline decision-making tasks.

Findings

IOM effectively mitigates distributional shift in offline RL, bandits, and MBO.

The approach balances between staying close to training data and optimizing decisions.

Experimental results show improved decision quality over prior methods.

Abstract

The goal in offline data-driven decision-making is synthesize decisions that optimize a black-box utility function, using a previously-collected static dataset, with no active interaction. These problems appear in many forms: offline reinforcement learning (RL), where we must produce actions that optimize the long-term reward, bandits from logged data, where the goal is to determine the correct arm, and offline model-based optimization (MBO) problems, where we must find the optimal design provided access to only a static dataset. A key challenge in all these settings is distributional shift: when we optimize with respect to the input into a model trained from offline data, it is easy to produce an out-of-distribution (OOD) input that appears erroneously good. In contrast to prior approaches that utilize pessimism or conservatism to tackle this problem, in this paper, we formulate offline data-driven decision-making as domain adaptation, where the goal is to make accurate predictions for the value of optimized decisions ("target domain"), when training only on the dataset ("source domain"). This perspective leads to invariant objective models (IOM), our approach for addressing distributional shift by enforcing invariance between the learned representations of the training dataset and optimized decisions. In IOM, if the optimized decisions are too different from the training dataset, the representation will be forced to lose much of the information that distinguishes good designs from bad ones, making all choices seem mediocre. Critically, when the optimizer is aware of this representational tradeoff, it should choose not to stray too far from the training distribution, leading to a natural trade-off between distributional shift and learning performance.