Impact of visual assistance for automated audio captioning
Wim Boes, Hugo Van hamme

TL;DR
This paper investigates how visual features influence automated audio captioning, revealing that semantic visual embeddings improve performance, whereas other features do not, highlighting task-dependent optimal visual information use.
Contribution
The study demonstrates the task-specific effectiveness of different pretrained visual features in audiovisual captioning, emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate embeddings for improved results.
Findings
Semantic visual features improve captioning performance
Other pretrained features show no significant gains
Optimal visual embeddings depend on the specific audio task
Abstract
We study the impact of visual assistance for automated audio captioning. Utilizing multi-encoder transformer architectures, which have previously been employed to introduce vision-related information in the context of sound event detection, we analyze the usefulness of incorporating a variety of pretrained features. We perform experiments on a YouTube-based audiovisual data set and investigate the effect of applying the considered transfer learning technique in terms of a variety of captioning metrics. We find that only one of the considered kinds of pretrained features provides consistent improvements, while the others do not provide any noteworthy gains at all. Interestingly, the outcomes of prior research efforts indicate that the exact opposite is true in the case of sound event detection, leading us to conclude that the optimal choice of visual embeddings is strongly dependent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMusic and Audio Processing · Speech and Audio Processing · Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
