How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy?
Tamara T. Mueller, Stefan Kolek, Friederike Jungmann, Alexander, Ziller, Dmitrii Usynin, Moritz Knolle, Daniel Rueckert, Georgios Kaissis

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new metric called PLIS to analyze how individual input attributes influence privacy loss in differential privacy, enabling identification of sensitive data and high-risk subjects.
Contribution
It proposes the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) metric, linking input attributes to privacy loss in DP neural networks, and demonstrates its effectiveness in identifying sensitive attributes.
Findings
PLIS effectively quantifies attribute-specific privacy loss.
Sensitive attributes can be identified using PLIS.
Subjects at high risk of data reconstruction are detectable with PLIS.
Abstract
Differential privacy (DP) is typically formulated as a worst-case privacy guarantee over all individuals in a database. More recently, extensions to individual subjects or their attributes, have been introduced. Under the individual/per-instance DP interpretation, we study the connection between the per-subject gradient norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss and introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS), which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes. We experimentally show how this enables the identification of sensitive attributes and of subjects at high risk of data reconstruction.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
