Comparing quantumness criteria
Jerome Martin, Amaury Micheli, Vincent Vennin

TL;DR
This paper compares different criteria for quantifying the quantumness of Gaussian states, revealing their equivalence in pure states and divergence under decoherence, linked to the state's phase space geometry.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of quantum discord, Bell inequality violation, and non-separability criteria for Gaussian states, highlighting their geometric control.
Findings
Criteria are equivalent for pure states
Criteria diverge under decoherence
Controlled by the ellipse's semi-minor axis in phase space
Abstract
Measuring the quantumness of a system can be done with a variety of methods. In this article we compare different criteria, namely quantum discord, Bell inequality violation and non-separability, for systems placed in a Gaussian state. When the state is pure, these criteria are equivalent, while we find that they do not necessarily coincide when decoherence takes place. Finally, we prove that these criteria are essentially controlled by the semi-minor axis of the ellipse representing the state's Wigner function in phase space.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
