Energetics of Cytoskeletal Gel Contraction

TL;DR

This paper models the energetics of cytoskeletal gel contraction by analyzing how molecular motor activity and polymer density influence the mechanical energy required for contraction, providing a thermodynamic framework validated by experiments.

Contribution

It introduces a thermodynamic model quantifying the energy needed for gel contraction based on motor activation timescales and polymer/motor densities, linking microstructural mechanisms to energetics.

Findings

Fast motor activation requires more energy for contraction.

Slow motor activation minimizes the energy needed.

Intermediate activation times yield energy requirements between the two extremes.

Abstract

Cytoskeletal gels are prototyped to reproduce the mechanical contraction of the cytoskeleton in-vitro. They are composed of a polymer network (backbone), swollen by the presence of a liquid solvent, and active molecules (molecular motors, MMs) that transduce chemical energy into the mechanical work of contraction. These motors attach to the polymer chains to shorten them and/or act as dynamic crosslinks, thereby constraining the thermal fluctuation of the chains. We describe both mechanisms thermodynamically as a microstructural reconfiguration, where the backbone stiffens to motivate solvent (out)flow and accommodate contraction. Via simple steady-state energetic analysis, under the simplest case of isotropic contraction, we quantify the mechanical energy required to achieve contraction as a function of polymer chain density and molecular motor density. We identify two limit cases, (fm) fast MM activation for which MMs provide all the available mechanical energy instantaneously and leave the polymer in a stiffened state, i.e. their activity occurs at a time scale that is much smaller than solvent diffusion, and (sm) slow MM activation for which the MM activation timescale is much longer. To achieve the same final contracted state, fm requires the largest amount of work per unit reference volume, while sm requires the least. For all intermediate cases where the timescale of MM activation is comparable with that of solvent flow, the required work ranges between the two cases. We provide all these quantities as a function of chain density and MM density. Finally, we compare our results with experiments and observe good agreement.