Comment on "Canonical transcorrelated theory with projected Slater-type geminals" [J. Chem. Phys. 136, 084107 (2012)]
Conner Masteran, Ashutosh Kumar, Nakul Teke, Bimal Gaudel, Takeshi, Yanai, and Edward F. Valeev

TL;DR
This paper critiques and clarifies the formalism of a previous transcorrelated theory, correcting errors, discussing unspecified aspects, and providing reference results to aid future research in the field.
Contribution
It identifies errors in the original formalism, clarifies overlooked details, and supplies reference data to support correct implementation.
Findings
Errors in the original formalism are corrected.
Unspecified aspects of the original work are clarified.
Reference numerical results are provided for validation.
Abstract
This Comment identifies errors in the formalism/implementation reported in Ref. 1 and discusses some aspects of that work that were not fully specified in the original publication. This Comment also provides reference numerical results for a simple system to ease future implementation of the approach by other researchers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTheoretical and Computational Physics · Data Analysis with R
