Automated Analysis of Drawing Process for Detecting Prodromal and Clinical Dementia
Yasunori Yamada, Masatomo Kobayashi, Kaoru Shinkawa, Miyuki Nemoto,, Miho Ota, Kiyotaka Nemoto, Tetsuaki Arai

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that automated analysis of drawing behavior using digital tools can effectively classify different stages of dementia and predict cognitive and neuropathological severity, offering a promising digital biomarker for early diagnosis.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel approach combining multiple drawing features to classify dementia stages and predict severity, validated on a sizable older adult cohort.
Findings
Achieved 75.1% accuracy in classifying CN, MCI, and dementia.
Predicted MMSE scores with an R^2 of 0.491.
Estimated severity of MTL atrophy with an R^2 of 0.293.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of dementia, particularly in the prodromal stage (i.e., mild cognitive impairment, or MCI), has become a research and clinical priority but remains challenging. Automated analysis of the drawing process has been studied as a promising means for screening prodromal and clinical dementia, providing multifaceted information encompassing features, such as drawing speed, pen posture, writing pressure, and pauses. We examined the feasibility of using these features not only for detecting prodromal and clinical dementia but also for predicting the severity of cognitive impairments assessed using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) as well as the severity of neuropathological changes assessed by medial temporal lobe (MTL) atrophy. We collected drawing data with a digitizing tablet and pen from 145 older adults of cognitively normal (CN), MCI, and dementia. The nested…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
