Wellfoundedness proof with the maximal distinguished set
Toshiyasu Arai

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a specific second-order arithmetic system can prove the wellfoundedness of certain large ordinals, extending the understanding of proof-theoretic bounds within set theory and second-order arithmetic.
Contribution
It shows that $ ext{Σ}^{1-}_{2} ext{-CA}+ ext{Π}^{1}_{1} ext{-CA}_0$ proves wellfoundedness up to certain large ordinals, linking second-order arithmetic with set-theoretic proof bounds.
Findings
Proves wellfoundedness up to $oldsymbol{ ext{ψ}}_{oldsymbol{ ext{Ω}}_1}(oldsymbol{ ext{ε}}_{oldsymbol{ ext{Ω}}_{oldsymbol{ ext{S}}+N+1}})$ for each $N$.
Establishes interpretability of the second-order system in set theory.
Extends proof-theoretic analysis of large ordinals.
Abstract
In arXiv:2208.12944 it is shown that an ordinal is an upper bound for the proof-theoretic ordinal of a set theory . In this paper we show that a second order arithmetic proves the wellfoundedness up to for each . It is easy to interpret in .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
