Complexity Results for Implication Bases of Convex Geometries
Todd Bichoupan

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of representing convex geometries with implication bases, proving NP-hardness for optimization and co-NP-completeness for recognition problems, highlighting inherent computational challenges.
Contribution
It establishes the NP-hardness of optimizing implication bases and co-NP-completeness of recognizing convex geometries, advancing understanding of their computational complexity.
Findings
Implication basis optimization is NP-hard.
Deciding if an implication basis defines a convex geometry is co-NP-complete.
Provides complexity bounds for key problems in convex geometry representations.
Abstract
A convex geometry is finite zero-closed closure system that satisfies the anti-exchange property. Complexity results are given for two open problems related to representations of convex geometries using implication bases. In particular, the problem of optimizing an implication basis for a convex geometry is shown to be NP-hard by establishing a reduction from the minimum cardinality generator problem for general closure systems. Furthermore, even the problem of deciding whether an implication basis defines a convex geometry is shown to be co-NP-complete by a reduction from the Boolean tautology problem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
