Dynamical criticality of spin-shear coupling in van der Waals antiferromagnets
Faran Zhou, Kyle Hwangbo, Qi Zhang, Chong Wang, Lingnan Shen, Jiawei, Zhang, Qianni Jiang, Alfred Zong, Yifan Su, Marc Zajac, Youngjun Ahn, Donald, Walko, Richard Schaller, Jiun-Haw Chu, Nuh Gedik, Xiaodong Xu, Di Xiao, and, Haidan Wen

TL;DR
This study reveals a spin-shear coupling mechanism in van der Waals antiferromagnets, where atomic layer shear significantly influences magnetic order, enabling ultrafast control through spin-mechanical interactions.
Contribution
It uncovers a novel spin-shear coupling in vdW antiferromagnets and demonstrates its critical role in magnetic dynamics and ultrafast control.
Findings
Interlayer shear couples with magnetic order.
Critical slowing down at magnetic transition temperature.
Linear coupling explains critical dynamics.
Abstract
The interplay between a multitude of electronic, spin, and lattice degrees of freedom underlies the complex phase diagrams of quantum materials. Layer stacking in van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures is responsible for exotic electronic and magnetic properties, which inspires stacking control of two-dimensional magnetism. Beyond the interplay between stacking order and interlayer magnetism, we discover a spin-shear coupling mechanism in which a subtle shear of the atomic layers can have a profound effect on the intralayer magnetic order in a family of vdW antiferromagnets. Using time-resolved x-ray diffraction and optical linear dichroism measurements, interlayer shear is identified as the primary structural degree of freedom that couples with magnetic order. The recovery times of both shear and magnetic order upon optical excitation diverge at the magnetic ordering temperature with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
