Shellability is hard even for balls
Pavel Pat\'ak, Martin Tancer

TL;DR
This paper proves that determining shellability and collapsibility is NP-hard for certain classes of triangulated complexes in dimensions three and higher, highlighting the computational difficulty of these topological properties.
Contribution
It establishes NP-hardness of shellability for triangulated d-balls with d≥3, and collapsibility for 3-complexes in 3-space, extending previous hardness results.
Findings
Shellability is NP-hard for triangulated d-balls when d≥3.
Collapsibility is NP-hard for 3-complexes embeddable in 3-space.
Shellability is NP-hard for 2-complexes embeddable in 3-space.
Abstract
The main goal of this paper is to show that shellability is NP-hard for triangulated d-balls (this also gives hardness for triangulated d-manifolds/d-pseudomanifolds with boundary) as soon as d is at least 3. This extends our earlier work with Goaoc, Pat\'akov\'a and Wagner on hardness of shellability of 2-complexes and answers some questions implicitly raised by Danaraj and Klee in 1978 and explicitly mentioned by Santamar\'ia-Galvis and Woodroofe. Together with the main goal, we also prove that collapsibility is NP-hard for 3-complexes embeddable in the 3-space, extending an earlier work of the second author and answering an open question mentioned by Cohen, Fasy, Miller, Nayyeri, Peng and Walkington; and that shellability is NP-hard for 2-complexes embeddable in the 3-space, answering another question of Santamar\'ia-Galvis and Woodroofe (in a slightly stronger form than what is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis · Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
