Byzantine Spectral Ranking
Arnhav Datar, Arun Rajkumar, John Augustine

TL;DR
This paper introduces a robust spectral ranking algorithm designed to accurately aggregate pairwise comparisons in the presence of malicious Byzantine voters, outperforming existing methods under adversarial conditions.
Contribution
The paper proposes the Byzantine Spectral Ranking Algorithm, which remains reliable when the number of good voters exceeds Byzantine voters, addressing a key vulnerability in existing spectral ranking methods.
Findings
The Rank-Centrality algorithm fails under adversarial Byzantine attacks.
The Byzantine Spectral Ranking Algorithm is robust when good voters outnumber Byzantine voters.
Experimental results confirm the algorithm's effectiveness on synthetic and real data.
Abstract
We study the problem of rank aggregation where the goal is to obtain a global ranking by aggregating pair-wise comparisons of voters over a set of items. We consider an adversarial setting where the voters are partitioned into two sets. The first set votes in a stochastic manner according to the popular score-based Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model for pairwise comparisons. The second set comprises malicious Byzantine voters trying to deteriorate the ranking. We consider a strongly-adversarial scenario where the Byzantine voters know the BTL scores, the votes of the good voters, the algorithm, and can collude with each other. We first show that the popular spectral ranking based Rank-Centrality algorithm, though optimal for the BTL model, does not perform well even when a small constant fraction of the voters are Byzantine. We introduce the Byzantine Spectral Ranking Algorithm (and a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Random Matrices and Applications
