A Probabilistic Proof of the nCPA to CCA Bound
Ben Morris, Hans Oberschelp

TL;DR
This paper offers a new probabilistic proof relating the advantages of certain cryptographic permutations, providing an alternative bound on CCA security that improves understanding of the swap-or-not shuffle's security with limited queries.
Contribution
It introduces a probabilistic proof method for the nCPA to CCA bound, offering a new sufficient condition based on separation distance, and tightens security bounds for the swap-or-not shuffle.
Findings
Probabilistic proof of nCPA to CCA bound.
Bound on CCA advantage via separation distance.
Improved security bounds for swap-or-not shuffle with fewer queries.
Abstract
We provide a new proof of Maurer, Renard, and Pietzak's result that the sum of the nCPA advantages of random permutations and bound the CCA advantage of . Our proof uses probability directly, as opposed to information theory, and has the advantage of providing an alternate sufficient condition of low CCA advantage. Namely, the CCA advantage of a random permutation can be bounded by its separation distance from the uniform distribution. We use this alternate condition to tighten the best known bound on the security of the swap-or-not shuffle in the special case of having fewer queries than the square root of the number of cards.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsgraph theory and CDMA systems · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
