Partial counterfactual identification and uplift modeling: theoretical results and real-world assessment
Th\'eo Verhelst, Denis Mercier, Jeevan Shrestha, Gianluca Bontempi

TL;DR
This paper develops theoretical bounds and estimators for counterfactual probabilities using uplift modeling, validated on synthetic and real-world data, advancing causal inference methods.
Contribution
It introduces new bounds on counterfactual probabilities based on uplift, and proposes a point estimator under conditional independence assumptions, with empirical validation.
Findings
Bounds depend on feature information about uplift
Proposed estimators outperform existing methods
Validated on synthetic and telecom data
Abstract
Counterfactuals are central in causal human reasoning and the scientific discovery process. The uplift, also called conditional average treatment effect, measures the causal effect of some action, or treatment, on the outcome of an individual. This paper discusses how it is possible to derive bounds on the probability of counterfactual statements based on uplift terms. First, we derive some original bounds on the probability of counterfactuals and we show that tightness of such bounds depends on the information of the feature set on the uplift term. Then, we propose a point estimator based on the assumption of conditional independence between the counterfactual outcomes. The quality of the bounds and the point estimators are assessed on synthetic data and a large real-world customer data set provided by a telecom company, showing significant improvement over the state of the art.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
MethodsCounterfactuals Explanations
