Differentially Private Vertical Federated Learning
Thilina Ranbaduge, Ming Ding

TL;DR
This paper explores applying differential privacy to vertical federated learning to balance data privacy and model performance, demonstrating experimental results on real datasets with various privacy budgets.
Contribution
It introduces a differential privacy framework for vertical federated learning and analyzes the privacy-performance trade-off through experiments.
Findings
Privacy-utility trade-off depends on the amount of noise added.
Optimal privacy budgets balance model accuracy and data protection.
Vertical FL can be effectively combined with differential privacy techniques.
Abstract
A successful machine learning (ML) algorithm often relies on a large amount of high-quality data to train well-performed models. Supervised learning approaches, such as deep learning techniques, generate high-quality ML functions for real-life applications, however with large costs and human efforts to label training data. Recent advancements in federated learning (FL) allow multiple data owners or organisations to collaboratively train a machine learning model without sharing raw data. In this light, vertical FL allows organisations to build a global model when the participating organisations have vertically partitioned data. Further, in the vertical FL setting the participating organisation generally requires fewer resources compared to sharing data directly, enabling lightweight and scalable distributed training solutions. However, privacy protection in vertical FL is challenging due…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
