Calculating Cognitive Augmentation, A Case Study
Ron Fulbright

TL;DR
This paper discusses a case study on cognitive augmentation, demonstrating significant improvements in accuracy and precision when humans collaborate with AI, and proposes new metrics for measuring such augmentation.
Contribution
It introduces formal metrics for cognitive augmentation and provides empirical evidence of their effectiveness through a detailed case study.
Findings
74% increase in cognitive accuracy
27% increase in cognitive precision
Proposes standard metrics for cognitive augmentation measurement
Abstract
We are entering an era in which humans will increasingly work in partnership and collaboration with artificially intelligent entities. For millennia, tools have augmented human physical and mental performance but in the coming era of cognitive systems, human cognitive performance will be augmented. We are only just now beginning to define the fundamental concepts and metrics to describe, characterize, and measure augmented and collaborative cognition. In this paper, the results of a cognitive augmentation experiment are discussed and we calculate the increase in cognitive accuracy and cognitive precision. In the case study, cognitively augmented problem solvers show an increase of 74% in cognitive accuracy (the ability to synthesize desired answers) and a 27% increase in cognitive precision (the ability to synthesize only desired answers). We offer a formal treatment of the case study…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
