An introduction to computational complexity and statistical learning theory applied to nuclear models
Andrea Idini

TL;DR
This paper explores how computational complexity and statistical learning theory can inform the limits of data-driven nuclear models, emphasizing the data requirements for achieving desired precision in nuclear physics predictions.
Contribution
It introduces concepts from computational science to analyze data limitations and model precision in nuclear physics, linking theory with practical modeling challenges.
Findings
Quantifies data needed for accurate nuclear mass extrapolation
Connects computational complexity with model precision in nuclear physics
Provides a theoretical framework for data sufficiency in scientific modeling
Abstract
The fact that we can build models from data, and therefore refine our models with more data from experiments, is usually given for granted in scientific inquiry. However, how much information can we extract, and how precise can we expect our learned model to be, if we have only a finite amount of data at our disposal? Nuclear physics demands an high degree of precision from models that are inferred from the limited number of nuclei that can be possibly made in the laboratories. In manuscript I will introduce some concepts of computational science, such as statistical theory of learning and Hamiltonian complexity, and use them to contextualise the results concerning the amount of data necessary to extrapolate a mass model to a given precision.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy · Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
