The Friendship Paradox and Social Network Participation
Ahmed Medhat, Shankar Iyer

TL;DR
This paper explores how social comparison driven by the friendship paradox influences content sharing behaviors in online networks, showing that responses can either decrease or sustain overall sharing depending on their nature.
Contribution
It introduces a simulation framework to analyze how social comparison impacts sharing dynamics, highlighting the effects of different behavioral response types.
Findings
Monotonic responses lead to declining sharing over time.
Convex responses can maintain or increase sharing levels.
Simulations are based on synthetic network models, not real-world data.
Abstract
The friendship paradox implies that a person will, on average, have fewer friends than their friends do. Prior work has shown how the friendship paradox can lead to perception biases regarding behaviors that correlate with the number of friends: for example, people tend to perceive their friends as being more socially engaged than they are. Here, we investigate the consequences of this type of social comparison in the conceptual setting of content creation ("sharing") in an online social network. Suppose people compare the amount of feedback that their content receives to the amount of feedback that their friends' content receives, and suppose they modify their sharing behavior as a result of that comparison. How does that impact overall sharing on the social network over time? We run simulations over model-generated synthetic networks, assuming initially uniform sharing and feedback…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Social Media and Politics
