On the effect of localized and delocalized quasiparticles on a nonlinear conductivity of superconductors
A. Gurevich

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the claim that surface-bound quasiparticles influence the nonlinear surface resistance of superconductors, arguing that previous models are incorrect and do not support the existence of such bound states affecting conductivity.
Contribution
The paper refutes prior claims about surface-bound quasiparticles affecting superconducting surface resistance and demonstrates inaccuracies in existing phenomenological models.
Findings
Surface-bound quasiparticles do not significantly affect $R_s$.
Existing models incorrectly predict the field and temperature dependence of $R_s$.
The supposed impact of bound states on nonlinear conductivity is not supported by the analysis.
Abstract
Recently Deyo et al. [\prb {\bf 106}, 104502 (2022)] suggested that the surface resistance of a superconductor under strong electromagnetic field can be affected by field-induced quasiparticle bound states at the surface. This Comment shows that the existence of such bound states and their contribution to are not substantiated and the phenomenological models of Ref. \cite{corn} give incorrect field and temperature dependencies of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Quantum and electron transport phenomena
