Towards a robust criterion of anomalous diffusion
Vittoria Sposini, Diego Krapf, Enzo Marinari, Raimon Sunyer, Felix, Ritort, Fereydoon Taheri, Christine Selhuber-Unkel, Rebecca Benelli, Matthias, Weiss, Ralf Metzler, and Gleb Oshanin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a robust power-spectral analysis criterion to distinguish between normal and anomalous diffusion in single-particle trajectories, addressing ambiguities caused by measurement errors.
Contribution
The authors develop and validate a new spectral criterion for identifying anomalous diffusion, demonstrating its robustness against measurement noise and its effectiveness in practical experiments.
Findings
The criterion reliably detects anomalous diffusion in fractional Brownian motion.
It remains effective despite the presence of measurement errors.
Experimental tests confirm its applicability to real-world data.
Abstract
Anomalous-diffusion, the departure of the spreading dynamics of diffusing particles from the traditional law of Brownian-motion, is a signature feature of a large number of complex soft-matter and biological systems. Anomalous-diffusion emerges due to a variety of physical mechanisms, e.g., trapping interactions or the viscoelasticity of the environment. However, sometimes systems dynamics are erroneously claimed to be anomalous, despite the fact that the true motion is Brownian -- or vice versa. This ambiguity in establishing whether the dynamics as normal or anomalous can have far-reaching consequences, e.g., in predictions for reaction- or relaxation-laws. Demonstrating that a system exhibits normal- or anomalous-diffusion is highly desirable for a vast host of applications. Here, we present a criterion for anomalous-diffusion based on the method of power-spectral analysis of single…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
