Justification of Recommender Systems Results: A Service-based Approach
Noemi Mauro, Zhongli Filippo Hu, Liliana Ardissono

TL;DR
This paper introduces a service-based approach to justify recommender system results by modeling user interaction stages, improving perceived support and satisfaction, and highlighting the need for personalized explanations.
Contribution
It proposes a novel service model for explaining recommendations, extracting interaction data from reviews, and organizing justifications around interaction stages.
Findings
Higher perceived user awareness support compared to baselines
Increased interface adequacy and satisfaction for users with different curiosity levels
Different preferences for explanation styles based on Need for Cognition
Abstract
With the increasing demand for predictable and accountable Artificial Intelligence, the ability to explain or justify recommender systems results by specifying how items are suggested, or why they are relevant, has become a primary goal. However, current models do not explicitly represent the services and actors that the user might encounter during the overall interaction with an item, from its selection to its usage. Thus, they cannot assess their impact on the user's experience. To address this issue, we propose a novel justification approach that uses service models to (i) extract experience data from reviews concerning all the stages of interaction with items, at different granularity levels, and (ii) organize the justification of recommendations around those stages. In a user study, we compared our approach with baselines reflecting the state of the art in the justification of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Methodstravel james
