Stressing Dynamic Loss Models
Emma Kroell, Silvana M. Pesenti, Sebastian Jaimungal

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel reverse stress testing framework for dynamic compound Poisson models, enabling risk managers to identify plausible adverse scenarios that satisfy specific constraints while minimizing divergence from the original model.
Contribution
It develops a mathematical framework for dynamic reverse stress testing, including existence, uniqueness, and characterization of stressed measures, and extends to multivariate processes and early-time stresses.
Findings
Stressed models depend on time and state variables.
The framework can incorporate VaR and CVaR constraints.
An algorithm for simulating stressed paths under the new measure is proposed.
Abstract
Stress testing, and in particular, reverse stress testing, is a prominent exercise in risk management practice. Reverse stress testing, in contrast to (forward) stress testing, aims to find an alternative but plausible model such that under that alternative model, specific adverse stresses (i.e. constraints) are satisfied. Here, we propose a reverse stress testing framework for dynamic models. Specifically, we consider a compound Poisson process over a finite time horizon and stresses composed of expected values of functions applied to the process at the terminal time. We then define the stressed model as the probability measure under which the process satisfies the constraints and which minimizes the Kullback-Leibler divergence to the reference compound Poisson model. We solve this optimization problem, prove existence and uniqueness of the stressed probability measure, and provide a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Portfolio Optimization · Statistical Methods and Inference · Probability and Risk Models
