Confidence-Ranked Reconstruction of Census Microdata from Published Statistics

TL;DR

This paper presents a new randomized optimization-based reconstruction attack that can accurately recover and rank individual entries in a private dataset from aggregate statistics, highlighting privacy risks in releasing detailed census data.

Contribution

Introduces a novel class of reconstruction attacks using randomized non-convex optimization, capable of reconstructing and ranking dataset entries from aggregate statistics.

Findings

Attacks outperform baselines based on public distribution.

Reconstructed rows can be reliably ranked by likelihood.

Demonstrated on U.S. Census and ACS datasets.

Abstract

A reconstruction attack on a private dataset $D$ takes as input some publicly accessible information about the dataset and produces a list of candidate elements of $D$. We introduce a new class of data reconstruction attacks based on randomized methods for non-convex optimization. We empirically demonstrate that our attacks can not only reconstruct full rows of $D$ from aggregate query statistics $Q(D)\in \mathbb{R}^m$, but can do so in a way that reliably ranks reconstructed rows by their odds of appearing in the private data, providing a signature that could be used for prioritizing reconstructed rows for further actions such as identify theft or hate crime. We also design a sequence of baselines for evaluating reconstruction attacks. Our attacks significantly outperform those that are based only on access to a public distribution or population from which the private dataset $D$ was sampled, demonstrating that they are exploiting information in the aggregate statistics $Q(D)$, and not simply the overall structure of the distribution. In other words, the queries $Q(D)$ are permitting reconstruction of elements of this dataset, not the distribution from which $D$ was drawn. These findings are established both on 2010 U.S. decennial Census data and queries and Census-derived American Community Survey datasets. Taken together, our methods and experiments illustrate the risks in releasing numerically precise aggregate statistics of a large dataset, and provide further motivation for the careful application of provably private techniques such as differential privacy.